Blog Details

Kinchla, R. A. Attention. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 43, 711–742 (1992).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Duncan, J. The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychol. Rev. 87, 272–300 (1980).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Lin, J. Y., Pype, A. D., Murray, S. O. & Boynton, G. M. Enhanced Memory for Scenes Presented at Behaviorally Relevant Points in Time. PLoS Biol 8, e1000337 (2010).

Article

Google Scholar

Swallow, K. M. & Jiang, Y. V. The Attentional Boost Effect: Transient increases in attention to one task enhance performance in a second task. Cognition 115, 118–132 (2010).

Article

Google Scholar

Turker, H. B. & Swallow, K. M. Attending to behaviorally relevant moments enhances incidental relational memory. Mem. Cognit. 1–16, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0846-0 (2018).

Swallow, K. M., Makovski, T. & Jiang, Y. V. The Selection of Events in Time Enhances Activity Throughout Early Visual Cortex. J. Neurophysiol. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00472.2012 (2012).

Makovski, T., Swallow, K. M. & Jiang, Y. V. Attending to unrelated targets boosts short-term memory for color arrays. Neuropsychologia 49, 1498–1505 (2011).

Article

Google Scholar

Swallow, K. M. & Jiang, Y. V. Perceptual load and attentional boost: A study of their interaction. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 40, 1034–1045 (2014).

Article

Google Scholar

Spataro, P., Mulligan, N. W. & Rossi-Arnaud, C. Divided Attention Can Enhance Memory Encoding: The Attentional Boost Effect in Implicit Memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1223–1231, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030907 (2013).

Mulligan, N. W., Spataro, P. & Picklesimer, M. The attentional boost effect with verbal materials. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 40, 1049–1063 (2014).

Article

Google Scholar

Swallow, K. M. & Atir, S. The role of value in the attentional boost effect. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1747021818760791, https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818760791 (2018).

Mulligan, N. W. & Spataro, P. Divided Attention Can Enhance Early-Phase Memory Encoding: The Attentional Boost Effect and Study Trial Duration. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000055 (2014).

Spataro, P., Mulligan, N. W. & Rossi-Arnaud, C. Limits to the attentional boost effect: the moderating influence of orthographic distinctiveness. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1–6, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0767-2 (2014).

Swallow, K. M. & Jiang, Y. V. Attentional Load and Attentional Boost: A Review of Data and Theory. Front. Psychol. 4 (2013).

Smith, S. A. & Mulligan, N. W. Distinctiveness and the attentional boost effect. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 44, 1464–1473 (2018).

Article

Google Scholar

Swallow, K. M. & Jiang, Y. V. The attentional boost effect really is a boost: Evidence from a new baseline. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0677-4 (2014).

Swallow, K. M. & Jiang, Y. V. Goal-Relevant Events Need Not be Rare to Boost Memory for Concurrent Images. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 74, 70–82 (2012).

Article

Google Scholar

Swallow, K. M. & Jiang, Y. V. The role of timing in the attentional boost effect. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 73, 389–404 (2011).

Article

Google Scholar

Corbetta, M., Patel, G. & Shulman, G. L. The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind. Neuron 58, 306–324 (2008).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Serences, J. T. et al. Coordination of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional control in human cortex. Psychol. Sci. 16, 114–122 (2005).

Article

Google Scholar

Jack, A. I., Shulman, G. L., Snyder, A. Z., McAvoy, M. P. & Corbetta, M. Separate modulations of human V1 associated with spatial attention and task structure. Neuron 51, 135–147 (2006).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Sokolov, E. N., Nezlina, N. I., Polyanskii, V. B. & Evtikhin, D. V. The orientating reflex: The ‘targeting reaction’ and ‘searchlight of attention’. Neurosci. Behav. Physiol. 32, 347–362 (2002).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Nieuwenhuis, S., Geus, E. J. D. & Aston‐Jones, G. The anatomical and functional relationship between the P3 and autonomic components of the orienting response. Psychophysiology 48, 162–175 (2011).

Article

Google Scholar

Sara, S. J. & Bouret, S. Orienting and Reorienting: The Locus Coeruleus Mediates Cognition through Arousal. Neuron 76, 130–141 (2012).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Wang, C.-A. & Munoz, D. P. A circuit for pupil orienting responses: implications for cognitive modulation of pupil size. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 33, 134–140 (2015).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Steiner, G. Z. & Barry, R. J. Pupillary responses and event-related potentials as indices of the orienting reflex: Pupillary responses and ERPs as indices of the OR. Psychophysiology 48, 1648–1655 (2011).

Article

Google Scholar

Kamp, S.-M. & Donchin, E. ERP and pupil responses to deviance in an oddball paradigm: ERP and pupil responses in an oddball paradigm. Psychophysiology 52, 460–471 (2015).

Article

Google Scholar

Aston-Jones, G. & Cohen, J. D. An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 403–450 (2005).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Nieuwenhuis, S., Gilzenrat, M. S., Holmes, B. D. & Cohen, J. D. The role of the locus coeruleus in mediating the attentional blink: A neurocomputational theory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 134, 291–307 (2005).

Article

Google Scholar

Gilzenrat, M. S., Nieuwenhuis, S., Jepma, M. & Cohen, J. D. Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 10, 252–269 (2010).

Article

Google Scholar

Unsworth, N. & Robison, M. K. A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 24, 1282–1311 (2017).

Article

Google Scholar

Brink, R. L., van den, Murphy, P. R. & Nieuwenhuis, S. Pupil Diameter Tracks Lapses of Attention. PLOS ONE 11, e0165274 (2016).

Article

Google Scholar

Aston-Jones, G., Rajkowski, J., Kubiak, P. & Alexinsky, T. Locus coeruleus neurons in monkey are selectively activated by attended cues in a vigilance task. J. Neurosci. 14, 4467–4480 (1994).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Rajkowski, J., Majczynski, H., Clayton, E. & Aston-Jones, G. Activation of Monkey Locus Coeruleus Neurons Varies With Difficulty and Performance in a Target Detection Task. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 361–371 (2004).

Article

Google Scholar

Bouret, S. & Sara, S. J. Network reset: a simplified overarching theory of locus coeruleus noradrenaline function. Trends Neurosci. 28, 574–582 (2005).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Grella, S. L. et al. Locus Coeruleus Phasic, But Not Tonic, Activation Initiates Global Remapping in a Familiar Environment. J. Neurosci. 39, 445–455 (2019).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Murphy, P. R., O’Connell, R. G., O’Sullivan, M., Robertson, I. H. & Balsters, J. H. Pupil diameter covaries with BOLD activity in human locus coeruleus. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35, 4140–4154 (2014).

Article

Google Scholar

Joshi, S., Li, Y., Kalwani, R. M. & Gold, J. I. Relationships between Pupil Diameter and Neuronal Activity in the Locus Coeruleus, Colliculi, and Cingulate Cortex. Neuron 89, 221–234 (2016).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Breton-Provencher, V. & Sur, M. Active control of arousal by a locus coeruleus GABAergic circuit. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 218 (2019).

Article

Google Scholar

Konishi, M., Brown, K., Battaglini, L. & Smallwood, J. When attention wanders: Pupillometric signatures of fluctuations in external attention. Cognition 168, 16–26 (2017).

Article

Google Scholar

Beatty, J. Phasic Not Tonic Pupillary Responses Vary With Auditory Vigilance Performance. Psychophysiology 19, 167–172 (1982).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Chatham, C. H., Frank, M. J. & Munakata, Y. Pupillometric and behavioral markers of a developmental shift in the temporal dynamics of cognitive control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 5529–5533 (2009).

ADS
CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Einhäuser, W., Stout, J., Koch, C. & Carter, O. Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 1704–1709 (2008).

ADS
Article

Google Scholar

Knapen, T. et al. Cognitive and Ocular Factors Jointly Determine Pupil Responses under Equiluminance. PLOS ONE 11, e0155574 (2016).

Article

Google Scholar

Nassar, M. R. et al. Rational regulation of learning dynamics by pupil-linked arousal systems. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1040–1046 (2012).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Privitera, C. M., Renninger, L. W., Carney, T., Klein, S. & Aguilar, M. Pupil dilation during visual target detection. J. Vis. 10, 3–3 (2010).

Article

Google Scholar

Karatekin, C., Couperus, J. W. & Marcus, D. J. Attention allocation in the dual-task paradigm as measured through behavioral and psychophysiological responses. Psychophysiology 41, 175–185 (2004).

Article

Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. Attention and Effort. (Prentice-Hall, 1973).

Wel, P. van der & Steenbergen, H. van. Pupil dilation as an index of effort in cognitive control tasks: A review. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1432-y (2018).

Eldar, E., Cohen, J. D. & Niv, Y. The effects of neural gain on attention and learning. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1146+ (2013).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Mathôt, S., van der Linden, L., Grainger, J. & Vitu, F. The pupillary light response reflects eye-movement preparation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 41, 28–35 (2015).

Article

Google Scholar

Mathôt, S., Grainger, J. & Strijkers, K. Pupillary Responses to Words That Convey a Sense of Brightness or Darkness. Psychol. Sci. 28, 1116–1124 (2017).

Article

Google Scholar

Binda, P., Pereverzeva, M. & Murray, S. O. Attention to Bright Surfaces Enhances the Pupillary Light Reflex. J. Neurosci. 33, 2199–2204 (2013).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Papesh, M. H., Goldinger, S. D. & Hout, M. C. Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 83, 56–64 (2012).

Article

Google Scholar

Naber, M., Frässle, S., Rutishauser, U. & Einhäuser, W. Pupil size signals novelty and predicts later retrieval success for declarative memories of natural scenes. J. Vis. 13, 11–11 (2013).

Article

Google Scholar

Kafkas, A. & Montaldi, D. Recognition Memory Strength is Predicted by Pupillary Responses at Encoding While Fixation Patterns Distinguish Recollection from Familiarity. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 64, 1971–1989 (2011).

Article

Google Scholar

Hays, W. Statistics. (Wadsworth Publishing, 1994).

Clark, H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 12, 335–359 (1973).

Article

Google Scholar

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. Artic. 67, 1–48 (2015).

Google Scholar

Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. & Christensen, R. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. J. Stat. Softw. Artic. 82, 1–26 (2017).

Google Scholar

Clayton, E. C., Rajkowski, J., Cohen, J. D. & Aston-Jones, G. Phasic Activation of Monkey Locus Ceruleus Neurons by Simple Decisions in a Forced-Choice Task. J. Neurosci. 24, 9914–9920 (2004).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Chiew, K. S. & Braver, T. S. Positive Affect Versus Reward: Emotional and Motivational Influences on Cognitive Control. Front. Psychol. 2 (2011).

Mather, M., Clewett, D., Sakaki, M. & Harley, C. W. Norepinephrine ignites local hotspots of neuronal excitation: How arousal amplifies selectivity in perception and memory. Behav. Brain Sci. 39 (2016).

Eldar, E., Niv, Y. & Cohen, J. D. Do You See the Forest or the Tree? Neural Gain and Breadth Versus Focus in Perceptual Processing. Psychol. Sci. 27, 1632–1643 (2016).

Article

Google Scholar

Warren, C. M. et al. Catecholamine-Mediated Increases in Gain Enhance the Precision of Cortical Representations. J. Neurosci. 36, 5699–5708 (2016).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Lee, T.-H. et al. Arousal increases neural gain via the locus coeruleus–noradrenaline system in younger adults but not in older adults. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 356–366 (2018).

Article

Google Scholar

Brink, R. L., van den, Nieuwenhuis, S. & Donner, T. H. Amplification and Suppression of Distinct Brainwide Activity Patterns by Catecholamines. J. Neurosci. 38, 7476–7491 (2018).

Article

Google Scholar

Schwarz, L. A. & Luo, L. Organization of the Locus Coeruleus-Norepinephrine System. Curr. Biol. 25, R1051–R1056 (2015).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Kebschull, J. M. et al. High-Throughput Mapping of Single-Neuron Projections by Sequencing of Barcoded RNA. Neuron 91, 975–987 (2016).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Uematsu, A. et al. Modular organization of the brainstem noradrenaline system coordinates opposing learning states. Nat. Neurosci. 20, nn.4642 (2017).

Article

Google Scholar

Seo, D. & Bruchas, M. R. Polymorphic computation in locus coeruleus networks. Nat. Neurosci. 20, nn.4663 (2017).

Article

Google Scholar

Wang, C.-A., Blohm, G., Huang, J., Boehnke, S. E. & Munoz, D. P. Multisensory integration in orienting behavior: Pupil size, microsaccades, and saccades. Biol. Psychol. 129, 36–44 (2017).

Article

Google Scholar

Molen, M. W. V., der, Boomsma, D. I., Jennings, J. R. & Nieuwboer, R. T. Does the Heart Know What the Eye Sees? A Cardiac/Pupillometric Analysis of Motor Preparation and Response Execution. Psychophysiology 26, 70–80 (1989).

Article

Google Scholar

Reimer, J. et al. Pupil Fluctuations Track Fast Switching of Cortical States during Quiet Wakefulness. Neuron 84, 355–362 (2014).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Krauzlis, R. J., Lovejoy, L. P. & Zénon, A. Superior Colliculus and Visual Spatial Attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 36, 165–182 (2013).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. & Beatty, J. Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory. Science 154, 1583–1585 (1966).

ADS
CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Talsma, D. & Woldorff, M. G. Selective Attention and Multisensory Integration: Multiple Phases of Effects on the Evoked Brain Activity. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 1098–1114 (2005).

Article

Google Scholar

Mathôt, S., Siebold, A., Donk, M. & Vitu, F. Large pupils predict goal-driven eye movements. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144, 513–521 (2015).

Article

Google Scholar

Desimone, R. & Duncan, J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193–222 (1995).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Brainard, D. H. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat. Vis. 10, 433–436 (1997).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Pelli, D. G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spat. Vis. 10, 437–442 (1997).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Mathôt, S., Fabius, J., Van Heusden, E. & Van der Stigchel, S. Safe and sensible preprocessing and baseline correction of pupil-size data. Behav. Res. Methods 50, 94–106 (2018).

Article

Google Scholar

Tuszynski, J. caTools: Tools: moving window statistics, GIF, Base64, ROC AUC, etc. (2018).